wrong about our core notions, we feel as if the core of us
is dying with the death of our conceptions.
Our opposition to the refutation of our misconceptions
frequently stems from our ego, the part of us that insists on its correctness.
It is this part that when extended creates the fundamental misconception
responsible for our mistaking ourselves to be material creatures, not spiritual
beings.
The Gita (02.07) begins with Arjuna admitting that he was
confused about his course of action – an ethical confusion that pointed to an
existential crisis. For a reputed ruler, the admission of his confusion and
delusion right in the middle of the battlefield in public view could well have
been seen as a death of the ego, but his courage in doing so became the roadway
to his self-actualization.
While resolving Arjuna’s crisis and confusion through its
profound wisdom, Gita wisdom differentiates between false ego and true ego:
false ego makes us hold on to false notions as the foundations of our
self-identity, whereas true ego enables us to assimilate truths as progressions
towards self-actualization.
The self is actually beyond destruction, being eternal and
spiritual. So the false ego’s paranoia that being proven wrong is
self-destruction is ontologically unfounded. Thus, by staying fixed in the pursuit
of scriptural truth even when it counters our preconceived notions, we see the
dissolution of the false ego as a demanding yet fulfilling roadway towards the
restoration of the true ego in its ontic position as the substratum of our
self-awareness as eternal parts of God, meant for eternal happiness in loving
reciprocation with him, in an arena free from the delusions of the false ego.
No comments:
Post a Comment