Don’t confuse “I can’t know” with “I don’t know” by
Chaitanya Charan Das Based on Bhagavad Gita Chapter 10
When applied to the question of understanding God’s glory as
is manifested in reconciling his paradoxical attributes, “I don’t know” is an
admission of ignorance. In contrast, “I can’t know” is a statement of
knowledge, an intelligent acknowledgement of the incomprehensibility of the
infinite when confronted with the finite human capacity for comprehension.
In the Bhagavad-gita (10.14), Arjuna acknowledges that not
even the gods can know Krishna’s personality and reiterates (10.15) that
Krishna alone knows himself. Yet this statement doesn’t stop him from enquiring
more about Krishna – to the contrary, he requests that Krishna speak about his
glories in detail for those glories are unendingly relishable.
Acknowledgment of divine incomprehensibility doesn’t imply
that Gita wisdom doesn’t answer basic questions about God’s glory – it answers,
and answers coherently and cogently many questions that have deluded thinkers
for millennia.
The Gita’s paradox – of acknowledging inability to know and
expressing desire to know – underscores that the purpose of knowledge on the
devotional path is not intellectual conquest, but devotional attraction.
Devotees want to know Krishna so that they can dissect him and have him all
figured out. They want to know him because they love him and we naturally want
to know more and more about those whom we love.
And when our love for Krishna is not yet strong, our
acknowledgement of Krishna’s ultimate incomprehensibility opens the doors of
paradoxes that were earlier intellectually shut for us during our spiritual
journey. We no longer let seeming contradictions check our onward march towards
Krishna.
We become like ocean divers whose purpose is not to measure
the ocean, but to find pearls in it. The deeper we dive into the ocean of
Krishna’s glories, the more we realize that his glories are infinite while
simultaneously relishing that infinitude and falling increasingly in love with
him.
No comments:
Post a Comment